Prototyping Theory
A reflection on how What Prototypes Prototype.
Quote 1
"Choosing the right kind of more focused prototype to build is an art in itself, and communicating its limited purposes to its various audiences is a critical aspect of its use.” pg. 1
Input
This resonates strongly with my experience prototyping interfaces for emerging tech products. When working on AI features, I've found that different stakeholders need different types of prototypes to understand the concept. Engineers might need a detailed workflow diagram, while users respond better to a simple interactive mockup that shows how they'll actually use the feature. The key isn't making the most complex prototype, but rather choosing the right format that will answer your specific questions and communicate effectively to your audience. This selective approach saves time and gets better feedback than trying to prototype everything at once.
Quote 2
“Tools can be used in many different ways, and detail is not a sure indicator of completeness.” pg. 2
Input
This challenges a common assumption I've encountered in design work that more polished prototypes are somehow more "complete" or valuable. I've learned that sometimes a quick paper sketch can validate an interface concept more effectively than a high-fidelity digital mockup. What matters is how well the prototype answers your design questions, not how finished it looks. For example, when testing a new navigation concept, rough wireframes might give you clearer user feedback than a fully styled interface where people get distracted by colors and details that aren't relevant to the core interaction being tested.
Quote 3
“Making separate prototypes enabled specific design questions to be addressed with as much clarity as possible. The solutions found became inputs to an integrated design." pg. 5
Input
This maps perfectly to how effective product development actually works in practice. Instead of trying to solve everything at once, breaking down a complex product into focused prototypes helps you solve specific problems clearly. When I'm working on a new feature, I might make one prototype to test the basic user flow, another to explore visual design options, and a third to validate specific interactions. Each prototype has a clear purpose, and the insights from each inform the final integrated design. This focused approach leads to better solutions because you can really dial in each aspect before putting everything together.